How do you obtain a dodecagon?

Looking for a specific model? Here's the place to start.
Post Reply
User avatar
Brimstone
Buddha
Posts: 1729
Joined: November 23rd, 2004, 3:59 am
Location: Colombia, South America
Contact:

How do you obtain a dodecagon?

Post by Brimstone »

Is theree a way to obtain an accurate dodecagon from a square or rectangle, doing a single cut?
User avatar
origamimasterjared
Buddha
Posts: 1670
Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
Contact:

Post by origamimasterjared »

Yes.

But why would you want to do it with a single cut? That alone will make it less accurate.
User avatar
origamimasterjared
Buddha
Posts: 1670
Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
Contact:

Post by origamimasterjared »

Inscribed a dodecagon inside a square, and this method came about pretty easily:

Image
User avatar
Brimstone
Buddha
Posts: 1729
Joined: November 23rd, 2004, 3:59 am
Location: Colombia, South America
Contact:

Post by Brimstone »

Thanks Jared. I prefer single cuts because if I have to do a cut for every side (or two), then the points of the eddges will not be whre they have to be.
User avatar
Brimstone
Buddha
Posts: 1729
Joined: November 23rd, 2004, 3:59 am
Location: Colombia, South America
Contact:

Post by Brimstone »

How about a hexadecagon, do you a have a way to make one?
User avatar
ahudson
Forum Sensei
Posts: 561
Joined: May 10th, 2006, 2:14 am
Location: California
Contact:

Post by ahudson »

Pretty much the same, but instead of dividing by three, you divide by four.
User avatar
origamimasterjared
Buddha
Posts: 1670
Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
Contact:

Post by origamimasterjared »

There are two really easy ways based on the same method.

First, is to fold into 4ths instead of 3rds. The cut you make will be different though.

The other method is to pleat into 8ths, then cut like in the dodecagon. This gives you a 16-gon with 4 edges along the edges of the square. It is slightly larger than the 4ths method, but it requires more creases, and skinnier triangles (both leading to increased error).

Too lazy to make a diagram, but here are the plans for both methods:

Image

Edit: in method 1 that cut won't be perpendicular to any existing crease. If it is, you'll just get an octagon. It would be perpendicular to one of the 11.25˚ creases, made by bisecting the angles again.
Last edited by origamimasterjared on July 28th, 2010, 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Brimstone
Buddha
Posts: 1729
Joined: November 23rd, 2004, 3:59 am
Location: Colombia, South America
Contact:

Post by Brimstone »

Thanks, I'll try the easy one.
Post Reply